Log in

Editorial Policies

Peer Review Process

All submissions are initially assessed by the journal's editor, who decides whether or not the article fits the scope of the journal and is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable are assigned to two or more independent experts, who assess the article for clarity, validity, and sound methodology.

The journal operates a double-blind peer review process, meaning that authors and reviewers remain anonymous for the review process. The review period is expected to take around four weeks. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.

Based on the reviewer reports the editor will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance. Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal’s Editor, who is supported by the Editor-in-chief and an expert, international Editorial and Advisory Board.

Section Policies

PLEASE NOTE: Submissions to this journal are only open to EUROSLA members of good standing (i.e. current members who have attended at least one EUROSLA conference in the last 3 years).